DoTheySupportIt logoDoTheySupportIt
SenateHouseBillsRecent stancesFAQ
DoTheySupportIt logoDoTheySupportIt

Tracking where politicians stand on crypto, from what they say to how they vote. Made to help create more economic freedom.

Explore

  • Politicians
  • Senate
  • House
  • Bills
  • Recent stances

About

  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  1. Home
  2. Crypto bills in Congress
  3. HR2384
HR2384119th Congress·Introduced 2025-03-26

Is The Bill "Financial Technology Protection Act of 2025" Crypto Friendly?

Based on 1 published commentary, this bill is neutral on crypto.

Neutral on Crypto
About this bill

This bill establishes an Independent Financial Technology Working Group to Combat Terrorism and Illicit Financing. The group, comprising various government agencies, financial technology companies, blockchain intelligence firms, and privacy organizations, will research the illicit use of digital assets and propose legislative and regulatory improvements for anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing efforts. It also mandates a presidential report on potential illicit uses of digital assets by rogue actors to evade sanctions or finance terrorism, alongside strategies to mitigate these risks.

Introduced
2025-03-26
Status
Introduced and Sponsored
Legislature
119th Congress
Stance on Crypto
Neutral on Crypto
From 1 published commentary

Scores reflect how a bill would affect crypto if enacted, from very anti-crypto to very pro-crypto, based on the commentary below.

Support in Congress
  • Sponsors2 Republicans2
  • Cosponsors3 Democrats · 3 Republicans6
Read the bill
Read on Congress.govView on GovTrackBill text (PDF)

Commentary

Add Commentary
Profile picture of DoTheySupportIt
DoTheySupportIt
Primary
marked this bill asNeutral on Crypto

The bill's focus is on national security and illicit finance, specifically addressing the use of digital assets by terrorist organizations and for money laundering or sanctions evasion. While the continuous framing of digital assets within the context of crime might contribute to a negative public perception, the structure of the proposed Working Group is designed to incorporate a range of perspectives. Including representatives from financial technology companies, blockchain intelligence firms, and privacy organizations suggests an intent to gather informed input and develop nuanced solutions rather than impose immediate, broad restrictions. The bill tasks the group with developing 'legislative and regulatory proposals,' which could lead to clearer rules for compliance without necessarily being overly punitive. This approach to study and propose regulations, with diverse stakeholder involvement, aligns with routine oversight measures rather than an explicit anti-crypto stance.

Where Congress stands

Every member who has sponsored, cosponsored or voted on this bill. Pick a vote to see how each member voted on it, or narrow by party, name or state.

Sponsors

2

2 Republicans

  • Profile picture of Ted Budd
    Ted Budd
    Senator · NC
  • Profile picture of Zach Nunn
    Zach Nunn
    IA-3

Cosponsors

6

3 Democrats · 3 Republicans

Democrats3

  • Profile picture of Kirsten Gillibrand
    Kirsten Gillibrand
    Senator · NY
  • Profile picture of Josh Gottheimer
    Josh Gottheimer
    NJ-5
  • Profile picture of Jim Himes
    Jim Himes
    CT-4

Republicans3

  • Profile picture of Warren Davidson
    Warren Davidson
    OH-8
  • Profile picture of Mike Lawler
    Mike Lawler
    NY-17
  • Profile picture of Cynthia Lummis
    Cynthia Lummis
    Senator · WY