DoTheySupportIt logoDoTheySupportIt
SenateHouseBillsRecent stancesFAQ
DoTheySupportIt logoDoTheySupportIt

Tracking where politicians stand on crypto, from what they say to how they vote. Made to help create more economic freedom.

Explore

  • Politicians
  • Senate
  • House
  • Bills
  • Recent stances

About

  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  1. Home
  2. Crypto bills in Congress
  3. S2877
S2877119th Congress·Introduced 2025-09-18

Is The Bill "No Stock Act" Crypto Friendly?

Based on 1 published commentary, this bill is somewhat pro-crypto.

Somewhat Pro-Crypto
About this bill

This bill prohibits certain senior government officials, including Members of Congress, the President, and Federal Reserve officials, along with their immediate families, from holding or trading "covered financial interests." These interests include most cryptocurrencies, meme coins, tokens, and non-fungible tokens. Upon assuming office, individuals must divest such assets. However, the bill explicitly excludes "payment stablecoins," as defined in the GENIUS Act, from this prohibition.

Introduced
2025-09-18
Status
Introduced and Sponsored
Legislature
119th Congress
Stance on Crypto
Somewhat Pro-Crypto
From 1 published commentary

Scores reflect how a bill would affect crypto if enacted, from very anti-crypto to very pro-crypto, based on the commentary below.

Support in Congress
  • Sponsors1 Democrat1
Read the bill
Read on Congress.govView on GovTrackBill text (PDF)

Commentary

Add Commentary
Profile picture of DoTheySupportIt
DoTheySupportIt
Primary
marked this bill asSomewhat Pro-Crypto

The bill's primary intent is to prevent conflicted financial interests among senior government officials. Its impact on the crypto industry is mixed but leans positive due to a significant carve-out. By defining "covered financial interests" to include a broad range of digital assets (cryptocurrency, meme coins, tokens, NFTs), the bill places them under the same restrictions as traditional securities for these officials. This suggests a regulatory perspective that views these assets as financial instruments subject to conflict-of-interest concerns, which could be interpreted as a slight negative for the broader digital asset market.

However, the explicit exclusion of "payment stablecoins," referencing the GENIUS Act for their definition, provides a strong positive signal. This differentiation offers enabling regulatory clarity for stablecoins, recognizing them as distinct from other digital assets and allowing officials to hold them. Given that stablecoins are viewed as a net positive for humanity within the evaluation framework, this specific legislative recognition and permissive stance for stablecoins is a notable pro-crypto development, outweighing the general restriction on other digital assets for this specific group of individuals.

Where Congress stands

Every member who has sponsored, cosponsored or voted on this bill. Pick a vote to see how each member voted on it, or narrow by party, name or state.

Sponsors

1

1 Democrat

  • Profile picture of Kirsten Gillibrand
    Kirsten Gillibrand
    Senator · NY