DoTheySupportIt logoDoTheySupportIt
SenateHouseBillsRecent stancesFAQ
DoTheySupportIt logoDoTheySupportIt

Tracking where politicians stand on crypto, from what they say to how they vote. Made to help create more economic freedom.

Explore

  • Politicians
  • Senate
  • House
  • Bills
  • Recent stances

About

  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  1. Home
  2. Crypto bills in Congress
  3. S3611
S3611119th Congress·Introduced 2026-01-12

Is The Bill "Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act of 2026" Crypto Friendly?

Based on 1 published commentary, this bill is very pro-crypto.

Very Pro-Crypto
About this bill

The Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act of 2026 aims to clarify the regulatory treatment of certain non-controlling developers or providers of distributed ledger services involved in digital assets. Specifically, it exempts those who do not have the unilateral ability to control or effectuate transactions from being treated as money transmitting businesses under federal law. This includes activities like creating software, providing maintenance, facilitating self-custody, or offering infrastructure support for distributed ledgers, ensuring they are not subject to similar registration requirements.

Introduced
2026-01-12
Status
Introduced and Sponsored
Legislature
119th Congress
Stance on Crypto
Very Pro-Crypto
From 1 published commentary

Scores reflect how a bill would affect crypto if enacted, from very anti-crypto to very pro-crypto, based on the commentary below.

Support in Congress
  • Sponsors1 Republican1
  • Cosponsors1 Democrat1
Read the bill
Read on Congress.govView on GovTrackBill text (PDF)

Commentary

Add Commentary
Profile picture of DoTheySupportIt
DoTheySupportIt
Primary
marked this bill asVery Pro-Crypto

This legislation represents a significant step forward for the crypto industry, providing much-needed regulatory clarity for foundational activities within the blockchain ecosystem. By explicitly defining and exempting "non-controlling developers or providers" from burdensome money transmission laws, the bill addresses a critical ambiguity that has stifled innovation and created uncertainty for software developers and infrastructure providers. This clarity fosters an environment where builders can focus on developing and maintaining decentralized technologies without the threat of being inadvertently classified as financial intermediaries.

The bill's proactive approach in distinguishing between actual money transmission and the provision of underlying technology or software is highly commendable. It correctly identifies that simply creating or publishing code, offering maintenance, enabling self-custody, or providing infrastructure support should not trigger the same regulatory obligations as a centralized financial service. This distinction is crucial for the health and growth of truly decentralized systems and prevents regulatory overreach that could stifle the development of future blockchain innovations. Such clear "rules of the road" are exactly what the industry needs to thrive, attracting talent and investment by reducing regulatory friction for core technological contributions to the distributed ledger space.

Where Congress stands

Every member who has sponsored, cosponsored or voted on this bill. Pick a vote to see how each member voted on it, or narrow by party, name or state.

Sponsors

1

1 Republican

  • Profile picture of Cynthia Lummis
    Cynthia Lummis
    Senator · WY

Cosponsors

1

1 Democrat

  • Profile picture of Ron Wyden
    Ron Wyden
    Senator · OR