DoTheySupportIt Logo
DoTheySupportIt
Privacy PolicyTerms and ConditionsFAQs

Made to help create more economic freedom.

DoTheySupportIt Logo
DoTheySupportIt
Home
>
All US House of Representatives
>
Brittany Pettersen

Does Brittany Pettersen Support Crypto?

Based on previous comments, Brittany Pettersen has indicated they are somewhat pro-cryptocurrency. Below you can view the tweets, quotes, and other commentary Brittany Pettersen has made about crypto.

Document a missing stance Brittany Pettersen has taken on crypto
profile picture of Brittany Pettersen

US Congressperson in the 7th district of Colorado

Democrat

Links

https://x.com/pettersen4co
https://x.com/RepPettersen
https://pettersen.house.gov/

Very Pro-Crypto

Voted for a bill on 2025-07-17
Bill Name
GENIUS Act
Details
The GENIUS Act of 2025 proposes a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins. It defines permitted issuers (insured depository institutions, their subsidiaries, and approved nonbank entities) and mandates 1:1 reserve backing with specific high-quality assets. The bill outlines federal and state regulatory oversight options, sets requirements for customer asset segregation, and grants stablecoin holders priority in insolvency proceedings. It also clarifies that regulated payment stablecoins are not considered securities or commodities under various acts. The bill designates issuers as financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act, requiring compliance with AML, KYC, and sanctions regulations to prevent illicit finance and safeguard national security. It also reinforces U.S. leadership in digital finance by supporting innovation and ensuring the dollar remains competitive in a rapidly evolving global financial landscape.
Vote Type
bb
Add your own commentary on this stance

Somewhat Anti-Crypto

Voted against a bill on 2025-07-17
Bill Name
CLARITY Act
Details
The "Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025," or "CLARITY Act of 2025," establishes a regulatory framework for digital commodities, granting the CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over spot market transactions and related entities like exchanges, brokers, and dealers. It aims to differentiate digital commodities from securities, introduce a "mature blockchain system" concept for regulatory exemptions, and protect individual self-custody rights.
Vote Type
Final Passage Out Of House
Add your own commentary on this stance

Very Pro-Crypto

X profile picture of @RepPettersen
U.S. Rep. Brittany Pettersen
@RepPettersen
Grateful to have had a seat at the negotiating table as a member of @USHouseFSC working to establish long-overdue regulations for digital currencies. Today, I voted for the GENIUS Act because as crypto & other digital assets have the potential to become the next financial frontier, we must build a clear regulatory framework for how payment stablecoins operate. While I’m grateful for how far we’ve come in negotiating this bill, I’m hopeful that the Senate will be able to fix some of the issues. And unfortunately, we also haven’t been able to address the blatant corruption and profiteering of the President yet in this bill. Congress needs to support innovation to bolster our leadership in the digital assets industry while making sure we are providing the protections Americans deserve.
2025-07-17T21:25:56.000Z
View original post
Add your own commentary on this stance

Very Anti-Crypto

Quoted from cointelegraph.com on 2025-06-11

“The US House Committee on Financial Services has advanced a crypto market structure bill called the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act, which will soon head to the full House floor for a vote.

House Financial Services lawmakers voted 32 to 19 on Tuesday to put the CLARITY Act to a full floor vote…”

Brittany Pettersen was one of the representatives who voted against advancing this pro-crypto legislation.

Add your own commentary on this stance

Very Pro-Crypto

Voted for a bill on 2025-03-11
Bill Name
H.J. Res 25
Details
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales".
Vote Type
Final Passage Out Of House
Add your own commentary on this stance

Somewhat Anti-Crypto

Voted against a bill on 2024-05-23
Bill Name
CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act
Details
To amend the Federal Reserve Act to prohibit the Federal Reserve banks from offering certain products or services directly to an individual, to prohibit the use of central bank digital currency for monetary policy, and for other purposes.
Vote Type
Final Passage Out Of House
Add your own commentary on this stance

Very Pro-Crypto

Voted for a bill on 2024-05-22
Bill Name
FIT21
Details
Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act
Vote Type
Final Passage Out Of House
Add your own commentary on this stance

Very Anti-Crypto

Voted against a bill on 2024-05-08
Bill Name
SAB 121 House Joint Resolution
Details
For congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to "Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121". This staff accounting bulletin expresses the views of the staff regarding the accounting for obligations to safeguard crypto-assets an entity holds for platform users.
Vote Type
Final Passage Out Of House
Add your own commentary on this stance

Somewhat Pro-Crypto

Quoted from neonewstoday.com on 2023-12-18

NNT and COZ met with the district directors for Representatives Dr. Yadira Caraveo and Brittany Pettersen in Denver, CO. The purpose of the meeting was for the Neo ecosystem and other Web3 project owners to share more about their work in Colorado, learn where the Congressional representatives stand on issues, and discuss areas of overlap.

Add your own commentary on this stance

Very Pro-Crypto

Quoted from docs.house.gov on 2023-07-26

Representative Brittany Pettersen voted in favor of advancing H.R. 4763, the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act, out of the House Financial Services Committee. The recorded vote showed 35 ayes to 15 nays.

Add your own commentary on this stance