DoTheySupportIt Logo
DoTheySupportIt
Privacy PolicyTerms and ConditionsFAQs

Made to help create more economic freedom.

DoTheySupportIt Logo
DoTheySupportIt
Home
>
All US House of Representatives
>
David Taylor

Does David Taylor Support Crypto?

Based on previous comments, David Taylor has indicated they are very pro-cryptocurrency. Below you can view the tweets, quotes, and other commentary David Taylor has made about crypto.

Document a missing stance David Taylor has taken on crypto
profile picture of David Taylor

US Congressperson in the 2nd district of Ohio

Republican

Links

https://x.com/davetaylorOH
https://x.com/RepDaveTaylor
https://davetaylorforcongress.com/cryptocurrency/

Very Pro-Crypto

Voted for a bill on 2025-07-17
Bill Name
GENIUS Act

Details
The GENIUS Act of 2025 proposes a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins. It defines permitted issuers (insured depository institutions, their subsidiaries, and approved nonbank entities) and mandates 1:1 reserve backing with specific high-quality assets. The bill outlines federal and state regulatory oversight options, sets requirements for customer asset segregation, and grants stablecoin holders priority in insolvency proceedings. It also clarifies that regulated payment stablecoins are not considered securities or commodities under various acts. The bill designates issuers as financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act, requiring compliance with AML, KYC, and sanctions regulations to prevent illicit finance and safeguard national security. It also reinforces U.S. leadership in digital finance by supporting innovation and ensuring the dollar remains competitive in a rapidly evolving global financial landscape.

Vote Type
bb
Add your own commentary on this stance

Somewhat Pro-Crypto

Voted for a bill on 2025-07-17
Bill Name
CLARITY Act

Details
The "Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025," or "CLARITY Act of 2025," establishes a regulatory framework for digital commodities, granting the CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over spot market transactions and related entities like exchanges, brokers, and dealers. It aims to differentiate digital commodities from securities, introduce a "mature blockchain system" concept for regulatory exemptions, and protect individual self-custody rights.

Vote Type
Final Passage Out Of House
Add your own commentary on this stance

Very Pro-Crypto

X profile picture of @RepDaveTaylor
Representative Dave Taylor
@RepDaveTaylor
Keep Big Brother out of Americans’ wallets. 210 Democrats just voted to allow a central bank digital currency that could be used to track Americans' transactions AND censor political opponents. Needless to say, I voted in support of the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act to happen.
tweet image
2025-07-17T20:05:04.000Z
View original post
Add your own commentary on this stance

Very Pro-Crypto

Voted for a bill on 2025-03-11
Bill Name
H.J. Res 25

Details
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales".

Vote Type
Final Passage Out Of House
Add your own commentary on this stance

Very Pro-Crypto

X profile picture of @davetaylorOH
Dave Taylor
@davetaylorOH
With bitcoin hitting record highs, Americans are waking up to the freedom that is cryptocurrency. In Congress, I will oppose unnecessary regulations on cryptocurrency and support a clear regulatory framework for the industry that gets government out of the way.
2024-03-06T13:17:08.000Z
View original post
Add your own commentary on this stance

Very Pro-Crypto

X profile picture of @davetaylorOH
Dave Taylor
@davetaylorOH
Government has no business imposing arbitrary and burdensome regulations on the financial freedom of the American people. Existing law already protects consumers and punishes fraudsters, we do not need a separate set of rules for cryptocurrency. davetaylorforcongress.com/cryptocurrency/
2024-02-17T20:25:18.000Z
View original post
Add your own commentary on this stance