DoTheySupportIt Logo
DoTheySupportIt
Privacy PolicyTerms and ConditionsFAQs

Made to help create more economic freedom.

DoTheySupportIt Logo
DoTheySupportIt
Home
>
All US Senators
>
Mark Warner

Does Mark Warner Support Crypto?

Based on previous comments, Mark Warner has indicated they are very pro-cryptocurrency. Below you can view the tweets, quotes, and other commentary Mark Warner has made about crypto.

Document a missing stance Mark Warner has taken on crypto
profile picture of Mark Warner

US Senator from Virginia

Democrat

Links

https://x.com/MarkWarner
https://x.com/MarkWarnerVA
https://www.warner.senate.gov
Took stances on a bill between 2025-05-20T00:00:00.000Z and 2025-06-17T00:00:00.000Z
Bill Name
GENIUS Act

Details
The GENIUS Act of 2025 proposes a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins. It defines permitted issuers (insured depository institutions, their subsidiaries, and approved nonbank entities) and mandates 1:1 reserve backing with specific high-quality assets. The bill outlines federal and state regulatory oversight options, sets requirements for customer asset segregation, and grants stablecoin holders priority in insolvency proceedings. It also clarifies that regulated payment stablecoins are not considered securities or commodities under various acts. The bill designates issuers as financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act, requiring compliance with AML, KYC, and sanctions regulations to prevent illicit finance and safeguard national security. It also reinforces U.S. leadership in digital finance by supporting innovation and ensuring the dollar remains competitive in a rapidly evolving global financial landscape.

Timeline
2025-05-20
Very Pro-Crypto
Voted for - Because of the way Senate rules work, GENIUS could not have gotten to a final vote without members voting in favor.
2025-06-12
Very Pro-Crypto
Voted for - Because of the way Senate rules work, GENIUS could not have gotten to a final vote without members voting in favor.
2025-06-17
Very Pro-Crypto
Voted for - Final Passage Out Of Senate
Add your own commentary on this bill

Very Pro-Crypto

Voted for a bill on 2025-03-04
Bill Name
S.J. Res 3

Details
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales".

Vote Type
Final Passage Out Of Senate
Add your own commentary on this stance

Very Anti-Crypto

Voted against a bill on 2024-05-16
Bill Name
SAB 121 House Joint Resolution

Details
For congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to "Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121". This staff accounting bulletin expresses the views of the staff regarding the accounting for obligations to safeguard crypto-assets an entity holds for platform users.

Vote Type
Final Passage Out Of Senate
Add your own commentary on this stance

Very Anti-Crypto

X profile picture of @MarkWarner
Mark Warner
@MarkWarner
After concerning reports that Hamas and other terrorist groups may be raising money in cryptocurrency, I’m joining with my colleagues to push the Biden admin to take steps to limit crypto’s use in financing terrorism.
2023-10-18T17:25:00.000Z
View original post
Add your own commentary on this stance

Very Anti-Crypto

X profile picture of @MarkWarner
Mark Warner
@MarkWarner
We need to give the government modern tools to crack down on financial crime that uses cryptocurrencies. I’m proud to have introduced bipartisan legislation to enforce sanctions and protect our national security. warner.senate.gov/public/index.c…
2023-07-19T15:20:40.000Z
View original post
Add your own commentary on this stance

Neutral on Crypto

X profile picture of @MarkWarner
Mark Warner
@MarkWarner
We need to make sure Russia isn’t using crypto to evade sanctions – that’s why I’ve introduced a law to close loopholes and make sure our sanctions keep working. We’re making a real impact on the Russian economy, but we have to keep pushing.
2022-03-18T14:00:13.000Z
View original post
Add your own commentary on this stance

Somewhat Pro-Crypto

X profile picture of @MarkWarner
Mark Warner
@MarkWarner
This is an important EO from the Biden admin at a critical time – I look forward to working alongside the administration further as they continue to develop a clear federal strategy for crypto that prioritizes competition and economic security. cnbc.com/2022/03/09/her…
2022-03-09T20:54:01.000Z
View original post
Add your own commentary on this stance

Neutral on Crypto

X profile picture of @MarkWarner
Mark Warner
@MarkWarner
Continued my advocacy on this issue this morning by directly asking Fed Chair Powell about it – we must make sure that Russians are not using crypto to evade the sanctions the U.S. and our global allies have imposed. buzzfeednews.com/article/sarahe…
2022-03-03T16:06:58.000Z
View original post
Add your own commentary on this stance

Very Anti-Crypto

Mark Warner reposted the post below
X profile picture of @SenJackReed
Senator Jack Reed
@SenJackReed
We can’t let Putin & his cronies use crypto to evade sanctions. Joined @SenWarren @MarkWarner @SenSherrodBrown in urging U.S. Treasury to monitor & enforce sanctions compliance by the cryptocurrency industry. nytimes.com/2022/03/02/bus…
2022-03-02T17:24:28.000Z
View original post
Add your own commentary on this stance

Somewhat Pro-Crypto

X profile picture of @MarkWarner
Mark Warner
@MarkWarner
Some have misinterpreted previous language I had offered to favor proof of work cryptocurrencies – the intent was anything but: to reiterate, all the drafters have repeatedly emphasized they do *not* see validators under any consensus mechanism as subject to compliance.
2021-08-11T20:02:13.000Z
View original post
Commentary on Stance
Add your own commentary on this stance
Profile picture of DoTheySupportIt
DoTheySupportIt
marked this stance as somewhat pro-crypto

Mark Warner has generally been tech-savvy on regulation. He didn't expect the backlash he witnessed.

Very Anti-Crypto

X profile picture of @MarkWarner
Mark Warner
@MarkWarner
As @FACTcoalition has emphasized, that clarification from my colleagues was not necessary – and would have hastily and over-broadly carved out DeFi exchanges and custodians, even when they *are* in a position to collect this compliance information. thefactcoalition.org/congress-shoul…
2021-08-11T20:02:12.000Z
View original post
Add your own commentary on this stance

Somewhat Pro-Crypto

X profile picture of @MarkWarner
Mark Warner
@MarkWarner
They’ve made clear the scope of these provisions is limited – and said repeatedly to Senators that it would not capture miners in proof of work contexts, nor validators in proof of stake contexts. Nor would it capture devs simply contributing code to cryptocurrency projects.
tweet image
2021-08-11T20:02:11.000Z
View original post
Add your own commentary on this stance

Somewhat Pro-Crypto

X profile picture of @MarkWarner
Mark Warner
@MarkWarner
To be fair, obscure provisions of tax law aren’t something most Americans have a passing familiarity with. And in an area as complex and fast-moving as digital assets – it benefits all of us to be clear and get things right.
2021-08-11T20:02:11.000Z
View original post
Add your own commentary on this stance

Somewhat Pro-Crypto

X profile picture of @MarkWarner
Mark Warner
@MarkWarner
For over a week, the Administration has reiterated to all Senators involved that the scope of these rules would not extend to parts of the crypto ecosystem where entities wouldn’t in their normal course of business be able to collect the relevant information for tax reporting.
2021-08-11T20:02:09.000Z
View original post
Add your own commentary on this stance

Very Anti-Crypto

X profile picture of @MarkWarner
Mark Warner
@MarkWarner
As we saw on a different front last week, these decentralized exchanges seek to openly flout the established governance regime the US has sought to maintain. sec.gov/news/press-rel…
2021-08-11T20:02:08.000Z
View original post
Add your own commentary on this stance

Somewhat Anti-Crypto

X profile picture of @MarkWarner
Mark Warner
@MarkWarner
Second, it’s well-understood that if you pay for something in more than $10,000 cash, there’s a reporting requirement. The bill made clear that this applies to crypto, too, as Treasury had proposed. Even @BlockchainAssn claimed this was common sense bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
2021-08-11T20:02:08.000Z
View original post
Add your own commentary on this stance

Very Anti-Crypto

X profile picture of @MarkWarner
Mark Warner
@MarkWarner
First, we’re seeing decentralized exchanges openly advertise their non-compliance w/ regulatory and tax rules – that’s something that we seek to address in this legislation by making clear that, notwithstanding their claims, they’re still subject to compliance.
2021-08-11T20:02:07.000Z
View original post
Add your own commentary on this stance

Very Anti-Crypto

X profile picture of @MarkWarner
Mark Warner
@MarkWarner
The tax gap is especially pronounced in two areas: 1) Cryptocurrency exchanges (some of which openly advertise non-compliance) and custodial wallets, and 2) Businesses that receive cryptocurrency as payment but don’t report it.
2021-08-11T20:02:07.000Z
View original post
Add your own commentary on this stance

Somewhat Anti-Crypto

X profile picture of @MarkWarner
Mark Warner
@MarkWarner
First, we need to acknowledge that the innovation and excitement surrounding digital assets has at times obscured some real problems – perhaps none greater than the tax evasion and non-compliance we have continued to see. cnbc.com/2021/05/31/cry…
2021-08-11T20:02:06.000Z
View original post
Add your own commentary on this stance