DoTheySupportIt logoDoTheySupportIt
SenateHouseBillsRecent stancesFAQ
DoTheySupportIt logoDoTheySupportIt

Tracking where politicians stand on crypto, from what they say to how they vote. Made to help create more economic freedom.

Explore

  • Politicians
  • Senate
  • House
  • Bills
  • Recent stances

About

  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  1. Home
  2. U.S. House
  3. Michael Cloud

DoTheySupportIt grades politicians on crypto from how they vote and what they say. How it works

profile picture of Michael Cloud

US Congressperson in the 27th district of Texas

Does Michael Cloud Support Crypto?

Republican

6 votes · 2 sponsorships · 22 statements

Latest · 2026-08-05Post on X from @RepMichaelCloudVery Pro-Crypto
  • @MichaelJCloud
  • @RepMichaelCloud
  • cloud.house.gov
C
Crypto grade
Neutral on Crypto
Based on 30 stances

Based on previous comments, Michael Cloud has not indicated whether they are for or against cryptocurrencies. Below you can view the tweets, quotes, and other commentary Michael Cloud has made about crypto.

Document a missing stance

Full record

2026-08-05T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepMichaelCloud
Rep. Michael Cloud
@RepMichaelCloud
An expiration date is not a ban. It is an on-ramp. The Permanent CBDC Ban Act is legislation that would permanently prohibit the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency. Press Release ➡️ hcloud.house.gov/posts/release-…https://t.co/1l3mJ93Y5y
tweet image
2026-08-05T01:35:50.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-06-10T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepMichaelCloud
Rep. Michael Cloud
@RepMichaelCloud
A CBDC would not just be a surveillance tool. It would be a tool of control. Two years ago, the Biden administration wanted banks to report your account activity to the IRS if you had more than $600 in transactions and track firearm purchases through credit card companies. This reat.
tweet image
2026-06-10T19:41:06.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepMichaelCloud
Rep. Michael Cloud
@RepMichaelCloud
A permanent ban on CBDC is a critical piece when creating a sensible framework of good standards for digital assets in our country. Congress must codify President Trump’s EO into law.
tweet image
2026-05-29T19:57:46.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-05-18T00:00:00.000Z
Michael Cloud reposted the post below
X profile picture of @WashTimesOpEd
Washington Times Opinion
@WashTimesOpEd
“Don’t believe the advocates selling this as a harmless technological upgrade. CBDC is, in reality, a powerful tool for government surveillance and control over every American’s financial life,” @RepMichaelCloud and Rep. Keith Self argue.
2026-05-18T22:30:11.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-05-18T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepMichaelCloud
Rep. Michael Cloud
@RepMichaelCloud
The gun store you visit. The church you donate to. The medication you need. The books you buy. A CBDC lets Washington track all of it. That’s not a “digital upgrade.” That’s the infrastructure for financial authoritarianism. Congress must permanently ban it. Read more in the co-authored op-ed with @RepKeithSelf Found in the @WashTimes @WashTimesOpEd washingtontimes.com/news/2026/may/…
2026-05-18T20:34:47.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-05-18T00:00:00.000Z
Michael Cloud reposted the post below
X profile picture of @FreedomCaucusF
Freedom Caucus Foundation
@FreedomCaucusF
"Congress must ban CBDC NOW. PERMANENTLY."
tweet image
2026-05-18T13:42:59.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-04-30T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepMichaelCloud
Rep. Michael Cloud
@RepMichaelCloud
The sleepy Senate had hoped to send us a FISA extension with no changes that would be passed by UC to an empty House chamber. Today, we forced a vote on the Senate’s “clean” FISA extension that ignored our House bill that included a ban on a CBDC — I voted No. And so, even in is not over, and we are forcing the fight in the right direction. We now have 45 days to continue to work for 1) a permanent ban on a Central Bank Digital Currency, 2) FISA warrant protections, and 3) the 4th Amendment not-for-sale protections (to stop the mass-purchasing of your data by intel agencies). And with the extra time, we should open up the FISA discussion beyond 702 to include reforms to Title 1 (where much of the previous bad actions have occurred).
tweet image
2026-04-30T23:34:09.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-04-30T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepMichaelCloud
Rep. Michael Cloud
@RepMichaelCloud
A Central Bank Digital Currency would be the ultimate surveillance tool. Last night's vote on FISA presented the best opportunity to force the Senate to address CBDC. As one of the primary members pushing for the inclusion of a ban on CBDC, I supported the passage of FISA with f the House. Here's more on why....
tweet image
2026-04-30T16:51:39.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-04-27T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepMichaelCloud
Rep. Michael Cloud
@RepMichaelCloud
I’ve offered anti-CBDC amendments more than a dozen times, but the surveillance state is always hungry for more power—and unwilling to give up an inch.
X profile picture of @RepKeithSelf
Rep. Keith Self
@RepKeithSelf
❌Warrantless spying via FISA ❌Government purchase of Americans’ data ❌Flock cameras ❌Automobile kill-switches ❌Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) The surveillance state is alive, well, and growing. Americans have had enough. Our Fourth Amendment is not up for grabs!
2026-04-27T15:30:06.000Z
2026-04-27T18:28:43.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance

Commentary on Stance

DTSI Bot
@DTSIBot
submitted some AI-generated analysis

Representative Michael Cloud just earned a perfect 100 out of 100 stance score for his recent comments calling out the profound dangers of a Central Bank Digital Currency. Echoing concerns from Representative Keith Self about the expansion of warrantless spying and data harvesting, Cloud highlighted his relentless effort to pass anti-CBDC amendments to protect Americans from financial overreach. Why does opposing a CBDC earn a perfect pro-crypto score? It is crucial to understand the difference between decentralized crypto networks or private stablecoins, and a government-issued CBDC. Stablecoins are a massive net positive for humanity, offering fast, borderless settlement. A CBDC, on the other hand, is a programmable tool for the state. It gives unelected bureaucrats the unprecedented power to monitor, control, or even freeze your everyday transactions. Cloud understands this threat perfectly. He is not just offering lip service; his legislative record backs it up. He has consistently fought for a permanent, ironclad ban on CBDCs, warning that temporary bans just give the government time to build the surveillance infrastructure behind closed doors. He even voted against the GENIUS Act—a bill meant to regulate stablecoins—specifically because he felt it failed to protect self-custody and left a backdoor open for a CBDC. Conversely, he proudly supported the CLARITY Act, legislation that provides much-needed regulatory clarity for digital commodities while explicitly protecting the right to self-custody. When politicians recognize that financial privacy is a fundamental right protected by the Fourth Amendment, it is a monumental win for the digital asset space. Cloud's ongoing push to keep the surveillance state out of our wallets makes him a vital ally for financial freedom.
2026-04-10T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepMichaelCloud
Rep. Michael Cloud
@RepMichaelCloud
The surveillance state wasn't built in a day. It was built piece by piece, every time we decided to look the other way. The upcoming FISA reauthorization gives Congress the opportunity to restore civil liberty protections — warrant requirements, prohibition of buying data of e market, and a permanent CBDC ban.
tweet image
2026-04-10T19:40:37.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepMichaelCloud
Rep. Michael Cloud
@RepMichaelCloud
The FISA reauthorization debate is here. There are three things that need to be part of the conversation. 1. The Fourth Amendment is Not for Sale. Our intelligence apparatus should not be able to go around Constitutional protections by purchasing data from brokers. 2. A warrant ce agencies must operate within the Constitutional protections against warrantless searches against US citizens. 3. A permanent ban on a Central Bank Digital Currency. President Trump banned a CBDC by executive order. But future administrations could reverse that and turn it into a surveillance tool against the American People. FISA was built to go after foreign threats. Let’s make sure it stays that way.
tweet image
2026-04-09T22:57:12.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-03-13T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepMichaelCloud
Rep. Michael Cloud
@RepMichaelCloud
Blocking a CBDC for 5 years is REALLY saying "Give us 5 years to build it." We need a permanent ban.
tweet image
2026-03-13T13:14:22.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepMichaelCloud
Rep. Michael Cloud
@RepMichaelCloud
The Senate passed the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act without a permanent, ironclad ban on a Central Bank Digital Currency and CBDC research. What we have now is a "ban" that sunsets in 2030. This is a sneaky way of legitimizing the Federal Reserve’s efforts to develop a CBDC and essentially gives the Federal Reserve a five year on-ramp to develop and impose a surveillance state digital dollar. This 2030 "ban" is a Trojan horse disguised as protection, quietly paving the way for unconstitutional government overreach into every American's finances. This should be DOA in the House — for both the CBDC provision and the fact that the Senate has not yet passed the SAVE America Act.
2026-03-12T19:13:20.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-03-07T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepMichaelCloud
Rep. Michael Cloud
@RepMichaelCloud
President Trump's EO banning CBDCs is not guaranteed past his time in office. We need permanent law. He said it himself in January 2025 — he's ready to sign the legislation. Now the Senate needs to deliver: include PERMANENT—not temporary—anti-CBDC language in the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act.
X profile picture of @RapidResponse47
Rapid Response 47
@RapidResponse47
.@POTUS: "I also remain fully committed to my pledge never to allow the creation of a Central Bank Digital Currency in America. It won't happen."
2025-07-18T19:20:20.000Z
2026-03-07T21:51:17.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2026-03-06T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepMichaelCloud
Rep. Michael Cloud
@RepMichaelCloud
A Central Bank Digital Currency would expose every American to unconstitutional financial surveillance. It would hand the unelected Federal Reserve unprecedented power over your money — violating your civil liberties and financial freedom. The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act rily ban a CBDC that — in the perverse way the swamp interprets things — would actually create an on ramp to research, creation, and adoption of a CBDC. This bill should be dead-on-arrival unless the Senate includes stronger, permanent language forever banning a CBDC. Thank you to the 31 Members of Congress who joined me in demanding exactly that.
tweet image
tweet image
tweet image
tweet image
2026-03-06T16:24:35.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2025-12-10T00:00:00.000Z
Michael Cloud reposted the post below
X profile picture of @RepKeithSelf
Rep. Keith Self
@RepKeithSelf
🚨BREAKING: I have submitted an amendment to add a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) ban to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). Promises were broken to include this language in the NDAA. My amendment would fix the bill. The House Rules Committee meets later TODAY floor vote. I hope they do the right thing.
tweet image
tweet image
tweet image
tweet image
2025-12-09T20:14:57.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2025-12-08T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepMichaelCloud
Rep. Michael Cloud
@RepMichaelCloud
The NDAA text has no CBDC ban? Flashback to the longest bill-related vote in the history of the US House just a few months ago. The primary hold up was that the legislation left the door open for a Central Bank Digital Currency. The legislation only moved forward with the agreement from @SpeakerJohnson and @SteveScalise that: ✅ Stand alone anti-CBDC legislation would get a vote on the floor (passed the House, stalled in Senate) ❌ The anti-CBDC legislation would be attached to the NDAA - AND - every must-pass legislation that left the House until it was signed into law.
2025-12-08T22:00:11.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2025-07-18T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepMichaelCloud
Rep. Michael Cloud
@RepMichaelCloud
That’s why the House passed two standalone bills: H.R. 1919 to ban a CBDC outright, and the CLARITY Act to protect self-custody and support crypto innovation. The Senate should pass these bills immediately. If they don’t, we worked to ensure the CBDC ban is taken care of in the upcoming National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).
2025-07-18T00:16:30.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2025-07-18T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepMichaelCloud
Rep. Michael Cloud
@RepMichaelCloud
A CBDC could give federal bureaucrats full control over: — Every transaction tracked — Accounts frozen or censored — Political beliefs punished That’s not innovation. That’s surveillance.
2025-07-18T00:16:29.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance
2025-07-18T00:00:00.000Z
X profile picture of @RepMichaelCloud
Rep. Michael Cloud
@RepMichaelCloud
I voted NO on the GENIUS Act. It overlooks smaller community banks and current issuers, and most importantly—it fails to protect self-custody and leaves the door wide open to a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC).
2025-07-18T00:16:29.000Z
Very Pro-CryptoAdd commentary on this stance

All positions

  • Running to be US Congressperson in the 27th district of Texas
    3 January, 2027
  • US Congressperson in the 27th district of Texas
    3 January, 2025 - 3 January, 2027
  • Former US Congressperson in the 27th district of Texas
    3 January, 2023 - 3 January, 2025
  • Former US Congressperson in the 27th district of Texas
    3 January, 2021 - 3 January, 2023
  • Former US Congressperson in the 27th district of Texas
    3 January, 2019 - 3 January, 2021

How grades work

Each stance is scored from very anti- to very pro-crypto, and a person's grade is based on those scores. Newer stances can make older ones irrelevant.

Read the FAQ

Keep exploring

  • U.S. SenateWhere every senator stands
  • U.S. HouseWhere every representative stands
  • Crypto billsEvery crypto bill in Congress, scored
  • All politiciansGrades for everyone we track