DoTheySupportIt Logo
DoTheySupportIt
Privacy PolicyTerms and ConditionsFAQs

Made to help create more economic freedom.

DoTheySupportIt Logo
DoTheySupportIt
Home
>
Warren Davidson
>
Stance from 2025-02-11
>
Add Commentary

Analyze Warren Davidson's Stance

Make your voice heard by submitting your own commentary on this stance.

X profile picture of @WarrenDavidson
Warren Davidson 🇺🇸
@WarrenDavidson
Why would anyone prefer a stablecoin to traditional bank deposits? 1) Banks have fractional reserves. Although the risk of a bank default is normally small, cases like Silicon Valley Bank exist. Stablecoins are fully reserved with audited balances of 1:1 or higher. 2) Sins enables permission-less (no intermediary) payments essentially at the speed of light. Thus, banks, bank regulators, and traditional payment processors have lobbied aggressively to either block, stall, or undermine legal clarity for stablecoins. Congress should do the right thing: pass legal clarity for a time-tested, state-regulated regime, and protect self-custody.
2025-02-11T16:58:36.000Z
View original post
Very Pro-Crypto

You'll need an account to add your own analysis on this stance.

In addition to categorizing this stance, you can optionally provide more detailed score commentary documenting your thoughts and opinions for the rest of the crypto community.